In Section 4.2, we found that the output impedance of the simple MOS current mirror was limited. For a current output, we require an infinite output impedance. In this Section, we will discuss a frequently used method for increasing the output impedance, the cascode.
Figure 4.4: a) A cascode transistor, b) a self-biased
cascode current mirror, and c) a cascode current mirror
with separate generation of the cascode voltage.
Figure 4.4(a) illustrates the basic cascode configuration, in which two MOS transistors are used to realise an `improved' transistor. The transistor M1 realises the required transistor function, converting the input voltage, VG, to an output current, IDS. The operating point must be chosen, such that M1 operates in saturation. The second transistor, the cascode transistor M2, must maintain a fixed voltage over M2, independent of the voltage of the output node. In this way, the channel length modulation of M1 is reduced, and the current is less dependent of the voltage, VD, at the output node.
As M1 must be in saturation, the requirements are:
Similarly, M2 operates in saturation, and the following requirement
can be calculated for the cascode voltage, VCAS:
Finally, still using that M2 operates in saturation, the voltage VD
at the output of the cascode configuration, is required to be:
Figure 4.4(b) shows a self-biased cascode current mirror.
The transistor pair M1B and M2B is cascode configured, and
transistors M1A and M1B constitute a simple current mirror.
The term `self-biased' is motivated as follows. The cascode voltage is
generated automatically by the added input transistor M2A. The
cascode voltage can be calculated as follows:
Inserting the cascode voltage in the Requirement (4.25)
and noting that according to
Equation (4.6):
The transistors M2A and M2B are often designed to have the same
effective gate voltage, VGS-VT. The transistors are scaled relative
to their currents. Thus, the requirement is met within a margin of one
threshold voltage. When we consider Equation (4.26), we note
that this relatively large margin implies, that the useful voltage swing at
the output is reduced by this margin. The later can be considered the price
to pay for the `free' cascode voltage of the self-biased cascode
current mirror.
Figure 4.4(c) shows a cascode current mirror with separate
generation of the cascode voltage, VCAS. In this configuration,
VCAS can be selected freely. If the useful voltage swing is required
as large as possible, a small VCAS should be selected according to
Equation (4.26). At the same time, VCAS should exceed
the limit in Equation (4.25). In the example, VCAS is
generated by a single diode coupled transistor, MCAS, which conducts
the current IIN'. According to Equation (3.2):
Combining this with Equation (4.25) results in:
The of the cascode transistors is assumed to be scaled
with respect to the current.
In the following, a small signal analysis of the cascode configuration will be used to determine the output conductance. Figure 4.5(a) illustrates the cascode configuration, and Figure 4.5(b) a small signal equivalent diagram of the configuration. In the analysis, we consider VGS and VCAS at a constant voltage (small signal ground). An output current iout is applied, and the output voltage vout observed. The analysis is illustrated in the simplified small signal equivalent diagram in Figure 4.5(c).
Figure 4.5: a) Cascode transistor, b) small signal equivalent
diagram, and c) reduced small signal equivalent diagram.
The applied current must pass gds1, and the voltage must be:
Kirchoff's current law for the output node now results in:
A02 denotes the DC-amplification of M2 as discussed in
Section 3.4. Comparing this result to the output impedance
of a single transistor, (1/gds1), we realise that the cascode
increases the output impedance by an amount dominated by A02.
As illustrated in Figure 3.6, typical values of A02
may lie in the range 50-100. Thus, the cascode realises a significantly
higher output impedance.
The compact layout of cascode transistors is illustrated in
Figure 4.6. The simple layout in Figure 4.6(b)
is 10.515.0
, whereas the compact layout in
Figure 4.6(c) measures 10.5
9.0
.
The area is reduced by 40% using typical design rules for a 1
CMOS process.
Figure 4.6: a) Cascode transistor diagram,
b) simple layout, and
c) compact cascode transistor layout.
The compact layout has the further advantage that the parasitic capacitance
at the common node is reduced. The diffusion area is reduced from
57.75 to 15.75
, and the perimeter is reduced from
53
to 24
.