Dines Bjørner
June 19, 2003: 8 amOn A ``Grand Challenges'' Task Force
CSE: Computer Science and Engineering
IMM: Informatics and Mathematical Modelling
Building 322, Richard Petersens Plads
DTU: Technical University of Denmark
DK-2800 Kgs.Lyngby, Denmark
E-Mail: db@imm.dtu.dk, URL: www.imm.dtu.dk/~db
After a very brief overview of current effort in the broader areas of computer & computing science, primarily in the form of web reference, we bring a tentative list of some 20 European scientists from some 10-12 countries.
The computer & computing sciences, we believe, need to owe up to its status as an independent discipline, one that is on level with such other scientific disciplines as mathematics, physics, biology, etc.
One way to illuminate this (``owing up to'') is to gather sufficient support - in our (the computer & computing sciences) community -- for a small set of ``grand challenges'' that computer & computing science faces.
Some such ``grand challenges'' have been ventured:
This section is an edited quote of 17 grand challenge criteria reported by Tony Hoare:
We edit, while in the process of seeking formal permission, our quote - where `it' normally refers to any proposed grand challenge -- into:
Fundamental: It relates strongly to foundations, and the nature and limits of a discipline.
Astonishing: It implies constructing something ambitious, heretofore not imagined.
Testable: It must be objectively decidable whether a grand challenge project endeavour is succeeding or failing.
Revolutionary: It must impy radical paradigm shifts.
Research-oriented: It can be achieved by methods of academic research -- and is not likely to be met sôlely by commercial interests.
Inspiring: Almost the entire research community must support it, enthusiastically -- even while not all may be engaged in the endeavour.
Understandable: Comprehensible by and captures the imagination of the general public.
Challenging: Goes beyond what is initially possible and requires insight, techniques and tools not available at the start of the project.
Useful: Results in scientific or other rewards - even if the project as a whole may fail.
International: It has international scope: Participation would increase the research profile of a nation.
Historical: It will eventually be said: It was formulated years ago, and will stand for yers to come.
Feasible: Reasons for previous failures are now understood and can noe be overcome.
Incremental: Decomposes into identified individual research goals.
Co-operative: Calls for loosely planned co-operation between research teams.
Competitive: Encourages and benefits from competition among individuals and teams - with clear criteria on who is winning, or who has won.
Effective: General awareness and spread of results changes attitudes and activities of scientists and engineers.
Risk-managed: Risks of failure are identified and means to meet will be applied.
We intend to gather a small group of some 20 European computing
scientists to discuss ``Grand Challenges''
related to Formal Methods,
first by means of E-Mails, then during a workshop planned for early
2004.
We refer to the separate:
In the above document we will try build, over the next 10 months or so a list of references to proposals.
The following illustrates a possible agenda of action:
This document was generated using the LaTeX2HTML translator Version 2K.1beta (1.47)
Copyright © 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996,
Nikos Drakos,
Computer Based Learning Unit, University of Leeds.
Copyright © 1997, 1998, 1999,
Ross Moore,
Mathematics Department, Macquarie University, Sydney.
The command line arguments were:
latex2html -split 0 -toc_depth 6 fm-grand
The translation was initiated by on 2003-06-19